合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟(jì)大學(xué) |
聯(lián)合大學(xué) |
美國保潔 |
美國強(qiáng)生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關(guān)新聞Info
-
> Sb合金元素對鋅液與X80鋼表面張力、潤濕性及界面反應(yīng)的影響——實(shí)驗(yàn)
> 粘度、稠度和表面張力的共同點(diǎn)及在日常生活中的應(yīng)用
> 地下水質(zhì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)（GB/T 14848-2017）
> 張力儀更適合用于測試含表面活性劑的油水界面？
> 表面張力儀應(yīng)用案例：芳綸纖維復(fù)合材料浸潤性測量原理與步驟
> 各向異性表面張力條件下定向凝固共晶生長形態(tài)穩(wěn)定性（下）
> 脫模劑配方中加入石油磺酸鈉，可降低液體表面張力、減少界面形成
> 石油磺酸鹽中有效組分的結(jié)構(gòu)與界面張力的關(guān)系
> 表面活性劑在化學(xué)清洗中的應(yīng)用及研究進(jìn)展
> 臨界表面張力、噴霧距離等對成熟期煙草農(nóng)藥霧滴附著關(guān)鍵指標(biāo)的影響——摘要、材料與方法
推薦新聞Info
-
> 界面張力儀測定不同pH值下椰子球蛋白的界面張力變化
> ?內(nèi)外多腔室等級乳液制備及界面張力影響因素
> 水包油型（O/W）和油包水型（W/O）乳液結(jié)構(gòu)與界面穩(wěn)定性
> 中性聚合物鍵合劑(NPBA)與奧克托今(HMX)界面張力測定及應(yīng)用效果（三）
> 中性聚合物鍵合劑(NPBA)與奧克托今(HMX)界面張力測定及應(yīng)用效果（二）
> 中性聚合物鍵合劑(NPBA)與奧克托今(HMX)界面張力測定及應(yīng)用效果（一）
> 助劑臨界膠束濃度對芒果細(xì)菌性角斑病防治藥劑表面張力的影響（三）
> 助劑臨界膠束濃度對芒果細(xì)菌性角斑病防治藥劑表面張力的影響（二）
> 助劑臨界膠束濃度對芒果細(xì)菌性角斑病防治藥劑表面張力的影響（一）
> 腰果酚醛樹脂嵌段聚醚破乳劑表面/界面性能、油滴破裂速率常數(shù)測定（二）
表面活性劑是否對斥水性土壤的潤濕性有影響？——結(jié)論、致謝！
來源：上海謂載 瀏覽 1496 次 發(fā)布時間:2021-11-09
結(jié)論
不像人工創(chuàng)造的穩(wěn)定的驅(qū)蟲表面或多孔 介質(zhì)，拒水土壤表現(xiàn)出潤濕動力學(xué)，由此 最初疏水的土壤隨著時間的推移變得親水 與水接觸時。 初始潤濕動力學(xué) 排斥土壤通常歸因于 固液界面能 (γSL)，或液汽界面能 (γLV) 的降低，或兩者兼而有之。 γLV 的減少 建議是由于土壤表面溶解 活性有機(jī)化合物進(jìn)入與水接觸的水中 土壤。 在這項(xiàng)研究中，我們測試了土傳表面的影響 潤濕動力學(xué)的活性物質(zhì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)，與廣為接受的范式相反，土壤釋放表面 活性化合物不會加速潤濕過程。 因此很明顯，固體界面能的變化 表面（γSL 或 γSV），而不是液汽 表面 (γLV) 必須在驅(qū)動不穩(wěn)定排斥性土壤的潤濕動力學(xué)方面起主導(dǎo)作用。
致謝
本研究由以色列農(nóng)業(yè)部資助 和農(nóng)村發(fā)展，資助號 821-0088-04。
參考
Barrett, G. & Slaymaker, O. 1989. Identification, characterization, and hydrological implications of water repellency in mountain soils, southern British-Columbia. Catena, 16, 477–489.
Bisdom, E.B.A., Dekker, L.W. & Schoute, J.F.T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma, 56, 105–118.
Chen, Y. & Schnitzer, M. 1978. Surface-tension of aqueous-solutions of soil humic substances. Soil Science, 125, 7–15.
Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K. & Ritsema, C.J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43, 403–441.
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E.R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T. et al. 2006. Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 2465–2481.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A. & Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 33–65.
Doerr, S.H., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Shakesby, R.A. & Bryant, R. 2002. Water repellency of soils: the influence of ambient relative humidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 401–405.
Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J. & Goebel, M.O. 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 57–66.
Feng, G.L., Letey, J. & Wu, L. 2002. The influence of two surfactants on infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 361–367.
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Monograph No 9 (ed. A. Klute), pp. 383–411.
American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Graber, E.R., Ben-Arie, O. & Wallach, R. 2006. Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136, 11–19.
Hurrass, J. & Schaumann, G.E. 2006. Properties of soil organic matter and aqueous extracts of actually water repellent and wettable soil samples. Geoderma, 132, 222–239.
Letey, J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Repellent Soils 6–8 May 1968 (eds L.F. DeBano & J.F. Letey), pp. 43–47. University of California, Riverside, CA. Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K. & Pang, X.P. 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 61–65.
Ma'shum, M. & Farmer, V.C. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 623–626.
Roy, J.L. & McGill, W.B. 2002. Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167, 83–97.
Tschapek, M. 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicityhydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift fu¨r Pflanzenerna¨hrung und Bodenkunde, 147, 137–149.
Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. Wallach, R. & Graber, E.R. 2007. Effluent irrigation-induced soil water repellency: time dependent variation of infiltration rate and of water repellency at different levels of ambient relative humidity. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2346–2355.
Wallach, R., Ben-Arie, O. & Graber, E.R. 2005. Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1910–1920.
Wallis, M.G. & Horne, D.J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20, 91–140.